pgpfan:repudiability
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
pgpfan:repudiability [2021/05/23 22:59] – [Conclusion] needed ref to index. b.walzer | pgpfan:repudiability [2021/06/05 01:10] (current) – [Untrusted Correspondent] more articles to refer to. b.walzer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
This could be considered the true "off the record" | This could be considered the true "off the record" | ||
- | - Not connecting their identity to their cryptographic identity, or | + | - Not connecting their identity to their cryptographic identity(([[pgpfan: |
- | - Not signing their messages at all. | + | - Not signing their messages at all(([[pgpfan: |
... rather than having to try to weaken the effect of a cryptographic signature. Our practical example, PGP, works well in this case as it allows both options. Deniability can be seen here as a compromise solution for a problem that need not exist. | ... rather than having to try to weaken the effect of a cryptographic signature. Our practical example, PGP, works well in this case as it allows both options. Deniability can be seen here as a compromise solution for a problem that need not exist. |
pgpfan/repudiability.txt · Last modified: 2021/06/05 01:10 by b.walzer