pgpfan:efail
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
pgpfan:efail [2021/09/12 11:09] – An attempt to prevent distraction by misrepresentation... b.walzer | pgpfan:efail [2021/12/10 13:13] – Satire doesn't work. b.walzer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
- | To be completely clear... The word " | + | To be completely clear... The word " |
EFAIL was a list of different ways to cause inherently insecure message content (HTML email) to leak decrypted messages. Such data leakage was a known issue and was under routine exploitation at the time. This fact alone should be enough to convince most people EFAIL had nothing to do with either PGP (or S/MIME). When you have a hole big enough to drive a truck through there is no extra value in discussing the size and shape of the truck. Unfortunately in the case of EFAIL we need to spend time discussing truck dimensions. | EFAIL was a list of different ways to cause inherently insecure message content (HTML email) to leak decrypted messages. Such data leakage was a known issue and was under routine exploitation at the time. This fact alone should be enough to convince most people EFAIL had nothing to do with either PGP (or S/MIME). When you have a hole big enough to drive a truck through there is no extra value in discussing the size and shape of the truck. Unfortunately in the case of EFAIL we need to spend time discussing truck dimensions. |
pgpfan/efail.txt · Last modified: 2022/05/16 21:17 by b.walzer