pgpfan:schism
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| pgpfan:schism [2024/10/06 05:23] – [EAX] typo. b.walzer | pgpfan:schism [2024/10/06 05:36] (current) – [About the "OpenPGP Schism" (2023 Dec)] we have better names now. b.walzer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| More recently, the two factions that fell out of this have been, actively and publicly, promoting their somewhat different proposals. That sparked the article. | More recently, the two factions that fell out of this have been, actively and publicly, promoting their somewhat different proposals. That sparked the article. | ||
| - | I will refer to one faction as the GnuPG faction but acknowledge that there are other projects that support this position. For lack of a better name, I will refer to the other faction as Crypto Refresh Current (the latest IETF draft). | + | I will refer to one faction as the GnuPG faction |
| I will only talk about the most contentious issue: the addition of new block cipher modes. The scope of the proposed changes is vast, but the block cipher mode issue is the aspect of this I feel the most qualified to comment on. | I will only talk about the most contentious issue: the addition of new block cipher modes. The scope of the proposed changes is vast, but the block cipher mode issue is the aspect of this I feel the most qualified to comment on. | ||
pgpfan/schism.txt · Last modified: 2024/10/06 05:36 by b.walzer